This page no longer updated from 31 October 2001. Latest version can be found at www.astronautix.com

astronautix.com Buran

Buran on Pad
Buran on Pad - Buran on Pad - 340 pixel width

Credit: Dr.Vadim P.Lukashevich. 37,141 bytes. 341 x 300 pixels.



Article Number: 11F35. Class: Manned. Type: Spaceplane. Nation: Russia. Agency: Defence Ministry. Manufacturer: NPO Energia.

The Energia-Buran Reusable Space System (MKS) had its origins in NPO Energia studies of 1974 to 1975 for a 'Space Rocket Complex Program'. In 1974 the N1-L3 heavy lunar launch vehicle project was cancelled and Glushko was appointed chief designer of the new NPO Energia enterprise, replacing Mishin as the head of the former OKB-1. At the same time in the United States development work was underway on the space shuttle. The US Defence Department planned to use the shuttle for a range of military missions. The Soviet leadership, seeking strategic parity, wished development in the Soviet Union of a reusable manned spacecraft with analogous tactical-technical characteristics. The success of Apollo and the failure of the N1-L3 program pointed to serious deficiencies in the technology base of the Soviet Union. The time-honoured Soviet method of rectifying such situations was to copy the foreign technology.

To reduce development cost and risk, NASA and USAF shuttle trade studies had settled on a partially reusable design. While the solid propellant booster rockets were recovered, the cryogenic main propellant tank of the shuttle core was expendable. The main engines and guidance system were recovered with the orbiter.

The American shuttle design was studied intensively by Russian rocket scientists, but important aspects of it were rejected based on Soviet engineering analysis and technology:

The Soviet Union at this point had no experience in production of large solid rocket motors, especially segmented solid rocket motors of the type used on the shuttle. Glushko favoured a launch vehicle with parallel liquid propellant boosters. These would use a 700 tonne thrust four-chamber Lox/Kerosene engine already under development.

The high chamber pressure, closed-cycle, reusable 230 tonne thrust Lox/LH2 main engine being developed for the shuttle was well outside engineering experience in the Soviet Union. No engine using these cryogenic propellants had ever been used in Russian rockets, and the largest such engine under development was the 40 tonne thrust 11D57. Glushko believed that while a Soviet cryogenic engine of 200 tonnes thrust could be developed in the required time, to develop a reusable engine would be impossible due to limited experience with the propellants.


Buran configurationsBuran configurations - Aerodynamic configurations of Buran tested during development.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 20,255 bytes. 487 x 253 pixels.


This conclusion led to other important design decisions. If only expendable engines were to be used, there was no need to house them in the re-entry vehicle for recovery. This meant that the orbiter itself could be moved from the lateral mounting of the space shuttle to an on-axis position at the top of the rocket core. The result was the Vulkan - a classic Soviet launch vehicle design: booster stages arranged around a core vehicle, with the payload mounted on top. The elimination of the lateral loads resulted in a lighter booster, and one that was much more flexible. The vehicle could be customised for a wide range of payloads by the use of from two to eight booster stages around a core equipped with from one to four modular main engines. Either a payload container for heavy payloads (Glushko's LEK lunar base) or the military's required spaceplane could be placed on the nose as the payload.

As far as the manned orbital vehicle itself, three different primary configurations were studied extensively, as well as a range of more radical proposals. The obvious choice was a straight aerodynamic copy of the US shuttle. The shuttle's form had been selected by NASA and the US Air Force only after painstaking iterative analysis of over 64 alternate configurations from 1968 to 1972. It would obviously benefit the Soviet engineers to take advantage of this tremendous amount of work.


Buran configurationsBuran configurations - Configurations of Buran launch vehicle tested during development.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 35,059 bytes. 570 x 274 pixels.


However the NPO Energia specialists who had developed the Soyuz capsule disapproved of the winged US shuttle design. They knew from the extensive aerodynamic studies undertaken to develop Soyuz that there were large weight penalties and thermal control problems in any winged design. Their studies indicated that a lifting body shape capable of high angles of bank at hypersonic speed could nearly match winged designs in cross range. Therefore their preferred 1974 design was an unwinged spacecraft, consisting of a crew cabin in the forward conical section, a cylindrical payload section, and a final cylindrical section with the engines for manoeuvring in orbit. This unwinged MTKVA would glide to the landing zone at low subsonic speed. The final landing manoeuvre would use parachutes for initial braking, followed by a soft vertical landing on skid gear using retrorockets. After a great deal of detailed analysis the definitive MTKVA design proposed in May 1976 had a refined aerodynamic shape with a rounded triangular cross section. The 200 tonne vehicle had over twice the shuttle's mass and nearly three times the shuttle's payload.


Anechoic chamberAnechoic chamber - The anechoic chamber where Buran was given antenna tests. It also shielded certain activities from US ELINT spacecraft.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 33,806 bytes. 495 x 332 pixels.


The third configuration was a smaller spaceplane launched by a Proton-class booster. OKB MiG had been developing the Spiral lifting body spaceplane since 1965, but the project was underfunded and years behind schedule. Spiral was an ambitious concept that was to be launched by a hypersonic air breathing first stage. But the spaceplane itself had been refined in form as a result of years of analysis, wind tunnel, and sub-orbital sub-scale model tests. Chelomei's OKB, whose Raketoplan spaceplane had been cancelled in 1965 in preference to Spiral, also had a contender, the LKS. Evidently owing nothing to earlier Raketoplan designs, this used a shuttle-type wing on a smaller 20 tonne spacecraft.

The government decree 132-51 authorising development of the Energia-Buran system was issued on 12 February 1976 with the title 'On development of an MKS (reusable space system) consisting of rocket stages, orbiter aircraft, inter-orbital tug, guidance systems, launch and landing facilities, assembly and repair facilities, and other associated facilities, with the objective of placing in a 200 km Northeast orbit a payload of 30 tonnes and returning a payload of 20 tonnes'. The Ministry of Defence was named the Program Manager, with NPO Energia as the prime contractor. The official military specification (TTZ) was issued at the same time with the code name Buran. A declaration of the Presidium on 18 December 1976 directed co-operation between all concerned user, research, and factory organisations in realising the project. Chief Constructor within NPO Energia was I N Sadovskiy. Chief Designer for the launch vehicle was Y P Kolyako and for the orbiter P V Tsybin. NPO Yuzhnoye in the Ukraine would build the booster rockets. While NPO Energia would build the booster engines, the core Lox/LH2 engines would be built by Kosberg. Chelomei and MiG were to continue, at a modest level, design and test of their LKS and Spiral smaller spaceplanes as backups.


Buran subscale modelBuran subscale model - Buran subscale test article.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 26,215 bytes. 417 x 276 pixels.


The specification of the TTZ set forth payload requirements a bit greater than those set for the US shuttle. It required that the OK orbiter be accomplish the following: The MTKVA and Vulkan were used as a starting point, but modified to meet this requirement. Study of the competing designs indicated that despite the evident advantages of the MTKVA approach, there were serious technical and operational problems with that design. There was considerable technical risk in realising the vertical landing itself - and considerable operational risk in completing the fast and complex series of operations necessary to achieve the landing. There were also problems in ground handling - how to move the vehicle after it had landed, especially if this occurred outside of the normal landing zone. The final analysis of the problems indicated that the rational solution was an orbiter of the aircraft type. There was severe criticism of the decision to copy the space shuttle configuration. But earlier studies had considered numerous types of aircraft layouts, vertical takeoff designs, and ground- and sea- launched variants. The NPO Energia engineers could not find any configuration that was objectively better. This only validated the tremendous amount of work done in the US in refining the design. There was no point in picking a different inferior solution just because it was original.


Buran nose testBuran nose test - Buran nose assembly in static test

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 17,054 bytes. 186 x 294 pixels.


Therefore a straight aerodynamic copy of the US space shuttle, was selected as the orbiter configuration on 11 June 1976. MiG was selected as subcontractor to build the orbiter. For this purpose MiG spun off a new design bureau, Molniya, with G E Lozino-Lozinskiy as chief designer. Wind tunnel tests were conducted on a wide range of possible arrangements of rocket stages and orbiter positions. In the end, Buran was moved to the lateral position, as with the US space shuttle. The main engines, for the reasons given earlier, remained in the core vehicle. The liquid boosters were retained, but reduced to four in number. After being re-stressed for the lateral launch loads, the resulting Energia launch vehicle had half the lift-off mass and payload of the Vulkan. This was sufficient to carry the Buran with its required internal payload of 30 tonnes.

The MKS draft project was completed on 12 December 1976. The military assigned the system the index number 1K11K25 and the launch vehicle the article number 11K25. The draft project was reviewed by the expert commission in July 1977, leading to a government decree 1006-323 of 21 November 1977 setting out the development plan. The technical project was completed in May 1978. The flight test plan at the beginning of the project foresaw first launch of the booster in 1983, with the payload being an unmanned OK-ML-1 mock-up of the orbiter. This would not have a heat shield and remain attached to the booster. A second mock-up, OK-ML-2, would be used on the second launch, but be separated from the vehicle after burnout. However it would also be without heat shield, and be expended. The first flight Buran was to fly unpiloted in 1984. Manned flights were to be routine by the 1987 seventieth anniversary of the Soviet Union.


Buran subscale modelBuran subscale model - Buran subscale dynamic test article in test stand.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 20,205 bytes. 212 x 394 pixels.


The approved launch vehicle layout consisted of the core Block Ts stage, surrounded by 4 Block A liquid propellant boosters and the Buran orbiter or a payload canister. During assembly, transport, and on the pad these were attached to a Block Ya launch services module, which provided all pneumatic, electrical, hydraulic, and other services to the vehicle prior to launch.

The modular Energia design could be used for payloads of from 10 to 200 tonnes using various combinations of booster stages, numbers of modular main engines in the core stage, and upper stages. The version with two booster stages was code-named Groza; with four booster stages, Buran; and the six-booster stage version retained the Vulkan name. The 7.7 meter diameter of the core was determined by the maximum size that could be handled by existing stage handling equipment developed for the N1 programme. The 3.9 meter diameter of the booster stages was dictated by the maximum size for rail transport from the Ukraine.


Buran wind tunnelBuran wind tunnel - Buran wind tunnel model for testing strapon separation.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 10,768 bytes. 197 x 206 pixels.


Propellant selection was a big controversy. Use of solid propellants in the booster stages, as used in the space shuttle, was considered again. But Soviet production of solid fuel motors had been limited to small unitary motors for ICBM's and SLBM's. There was no technological base for production of segmented solid fuel motors, and transport of the motor sections also presented problems. The final decision was to use the familiar Lox/Kerosene liquid propellants for the boosters. In the 1960's Glushko had favoured use of toxic but storable chemical propellants in launch vehicles and had fought bitterly against Korolev over the issue. It is surprising that he now accepted use of Lox/Kerosene. But Korolev was dead, and the N1 a failure. Glushko's position had been vindicated, perhaps he now had to agree objectively that use of the expensive and toxic propellants in a launch vehicle of this size was not rational.

Another factor may have been that the propellants of the core were going to be cryogenic anyway. Lox/Kerosene propellants for the core were considered, but a primary objective of the project was to seek technological parity with the United States by exploiting technologies developed there. Chief among these in the field of liquid fuel rocketry was the use of Lox/LH2 propellants. Therefore the engines of the core were based on the Space Shuttle Main Engine (SSME) of the USA, with the same thrust rating and specific impulse specifications.


TPVK-1 test chamberTPVK-1 test chamber - TPVK-1 Vacuum/insolation chamber used for full-scale tests on Buran

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 24,244 bytes. 322 x 241 pixels.


Although the SSME may have been the starting point, Soviet engine technology led that of the United States in many other detailed points of liquid rocket design. By the mid-1960's the USA had practically abandoned development of liquid fuel engines, with the sole exception of the SSME. The US military preferred to use solid rocket motors for missile and booster stage applications. Russian rocket engineers had spent their entire lives perfecting military liquid fuel rockets and had never favoured solid fuel. Therefore Russian Liquid Oxygen/Kerosene and N2O4/UDMH engines were of much higher performance than those in the US. The contribution of unique Soviet technology and the inevitable changes that occurred during development resulted in the MKS RD-0120 main engine being different in detail from the SSME while retaining the same performance.

Drawing on this blend of mature American technology and Soviet innovation, the RD-0120 had a relatively trouble-free development program. The final engine represented for the Soviet Union new technical solutions in engine reliability, control, throttleability, and performance. These were the first fully throttleable Soviet engines, and their first production Lox/LH2 engines.


Buran static articleBuran static article - Converted Buran static article now a ride in Gorky Park

Credit: © Mark Wade. 38,956 bytes. 497 x 403 pixels.


By contrast the RD-170 engine for the booster stage was a purely Soviet design and experienced a slow and difficult development program. These were exactly the kind of closed-cycle liquid oxygen/kerosene engines that Glushko had opposed developing in the 1960's. In addition the TTZ required that they be reusable for ten missions. Glushko fell back on his old solution when being unable to handle combustion stability problems: an engine unit consisting of four chambers fed by common turbopumps. Providing adequate wall cooling for the high temperature / high pressure combustion chambers seemed at times insoluble. One problem followed another and finally the RD-170 became the pacing item, with rocket stages completed but lacking engines. As costs reached the project ceiling, Glushko and Minister Afanasyev had to escalate the fight to the highest levels of the Soviet leadership. But Glushko defended his people, retained his job, and the problems were eventually solved.


Space - Earth!Space - Earth! - Space - Earth! First space tourism flight! Poster for Buran ride in Gorky Park.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 29,565 bytes. 289 x 447 pixels.


The Block A 11S25 booster stages were the responsibility of KB Yuzhnoye in the Ukraine, F Utkin, General Constructor. They were to be reused ten times, and were therefore fitted with parachute containers. Solid fuel soft landing rockets in the parachute lines provided a soft landing downrange. It's not clear how the 35 tonne boosters were to be transported back to base for reuse.

In 1979 the EUK13 dimensional model of the launch vehicle was delivered to Baikonur for handling demonstrations and production of tooling. Continued development problems with the booster rockets led to a management shake-up at Yuzhnoye in January 1982. By this time the project was several years behind schedule. The originally planned first flight in 1983 was obviously unattainable. Also in 1982 the 3M-T transport aircraft was completed and began delivery of central block propellant tanks and structural elements for construction of a realistic mock-up of the booster. The 3M-T was a heavily modified M-4 bomber, and was limited to 50 tonnes loads carried on the top of the fuselage. By December 1982 the 4M Energia mock-up was completed, leading to dynamic/vertical/load tests in May-October 1983. The 4M was then returned to the shop for fitting of complete functional propellant systems.


Buran on 4MTBuran on 4MT - Buran transported on 4MT aircraft

9,726 bytes. 292 x 154 pixels.


The OK-KS Buran systems test stand was built at NPO Energia to conduct tests not possible on other stands. These included electrical layout, pneumo-hydraulic tests in abort conditions, EMI tests, failure mode response, telemetry, interface with the launch vehicle, software systems test. The test stand was completed in August 1983 and the test series was completed in March 1984. 77% of the tests of the OK were automated, compared with only 5% for the Soyuz-TM.

The 50 payload limitation of the 3M-T transport meant that the Buran orbiters had to be delivered in a severely incomplete and stripped-down condition to the cosmodrome. They were delivered without orbital systems, engine section, crew cabin, vertical stabiliser, landing gear, and with only 70% of the heat shield tiles. This meant that complex final assembly operations had to conducted at the MIK-OK at Baikonur. The OK-ML-1 orbiter mock-up arrived atop the 3M-T at Baikonur in December 1983 (This action seems to have been in the fine Soviet tradition of individual enterprises proving they have met the plan, even if the method of doing it is useless. OK-ML-1 was to have been used in the first launch of the Energia, by the end of 1983. By delivering it to Baikonur by December 31, the spacecraft builders could claim, "well, we met OUR part of the plan..."). OK-ML-1 was used for handling and pad compatibility tests. It was followed by the OK-MT in August 1984. This functional mock-up was used for systems integration tests, and was to be expended on the second test flight.


Buran control panelBuran control panel - Control panel of Aero-Buran jet-powered approach and landing test version of Buran. First Aero-Buran analogue rolled out in 1984. This Aero-Buran was worn out and would not be used again after 24 flights to April 1988.

Credit: RKK Energia. 10,251 bytes. 187 x 284 pixels.


From March-October 1985 the Ts core stage was back on the UKSS for cold flow tests. A total of nine cryogenic fuelling cycle were completed with the 4M Energia mock-up, representing the first operational use in the world of super-chilled hydrogen.

The OK-GLI Buran analogue flight vehicle, for horizontal subsonic approach and landing tests, was delivered to Zhukovskiy test flight centre near Moscow, followed by its first flight with Cosmonaut Igor Volk at the controls on 10 November 1985. Two flying labs, based on Tu-154 transports, were used to prior to this to duplicate anticipated Buran handling and test systems software. They conducted 140 flights before Buran's first flight, including 69 automatic landings at Zhukovskiy and at the Jubilee airfield at Baikonur.

In December 1985 the wings of the first flight OK arrived at Baikonur. This was followed by what was to be the first 20 second Energia main engine firing test. This was terminated at 2.58 seconds when the automatic control system detected a slow spool up of an engine turbine. In a the first attempt at a full-duration test helium leaks contaminated electro-hydraulic systems, leading to a situation where the tanks could not be drained. An engineering brigade had to work on the fuelled booster for 55 minutes, attach another helium tank, which led to successful de-fuelling of the vehicle. The second engine test was a complete success, the engine running for 390 seconds. This test required the entire city of Leninsk to be without water for ten days in order to accumulate enough water for the UKSS cooling system.


Buran docks to MirBuran docks to Mir - As it was supposed to be - Buran docking with Mir space station.

29,143 bytes. 298 x 377 pixels.


By January 1986 it was clear that the project, now three years behind schedule, had no prospect of completion due to problems in obtaining deliveries of equipment for Buran, numerous problems in assembling the orbiters and lack of manpower at Baikonur, and a general loss of management focus. Minister O D Bakhnov called large group of industry leaders to the cosmodrome to review measures to concentrate and accelerate the remaining work. Three 'Tiger Teams' were set up. The first, led by Semenov, was to finish the flight Buran orbiter and associated facilities in time for a third quarter 1987 launch. The second, led by B I Gubanov, was to finish the Energia launch vehicle and fly it, without the Buran mock-ups if necessary, at the earliest possible date. The third group, led by S S Banin, was to complete the assembly and launch facilities.

These groups were given unlimited authority to obtain necessary resources to complete their missions. As was usual on crash programs, working in parallel meant that there was some duplication of effort and some work had to be repeated to take into account changes made by the other groups. But the results were immediate. Facility 211 at Baikonur alone increased from 60 to 1800 staff by March 1986.


Buran Atop MriyaBuran Atop Mriya - Buran atop its An-225 Mriya carrier, as displayed at the Paria Air show shortly after its spaceflight.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 22,168 bytes. 538 x 262 pixels.


The first Buran payload, 37KB module s/n 37070, arrived in Baikonur in February 1986. The 37KB modules, similar to the Kvant module of the Mir space station, were to be standard on the early Buran flights. 37KB-37070 itself primarily contained instrumentation to measure the performance of the orbiter and its structure on its first flight.

As with the American shuttle, tile installation was a big problem. However once adequate manpower was provided the work was completed in three months. Electrical tests of the Buran flight vehicle began in May 1986. Tests of the orbiter's ODU engine unit uncovered an apparent defect in gaseous oxygen valves of the reaction control system. Although it threatened to delay flight of the Buran, it was eventually discovered to be a software problem and remedied within days.

In August-September 1986 further UKSS tests of Energia were conducted in preparation of a test launch without Buran. These were conducted using a dummy payload and solid rocket motors to simulate loads from the booster rockets. Following this vehicle 6SL was selected for the first actual launch. The launch vehicle used by itself without Buran was named Energia by Glushko only just before the launch. Energia was to deliver the military Skif-DM Polyus battle station into orbit. This was to be followed by ten flights of Energia-Buran, only the first of which was to be unpiloted.


An-225 / BuranAn-225 / Buran

35,043 bytes. 638 x 228 pixels.


Due to delays in completion of the enormous static test facility at Baikonur, which could test the entire Energia vehicle stack, it was decided to launch the vehicle without the verification the tests would provide. The launch of 6SL was planned for 11 May 1987 at 21:30 Moscow time. It was delayed five hours when a leak was detected in the Block 3A electrical distribution section, then by another hour due to a fault LH2 thermostat. The launch vehicle performed successfully, but the payload failed to inject itself into orbit due to a guidance system failure.

With the launch vehicle finally proven, the focus moved to clearing Buran for flight. Two variants of the first unmanned mission were considered: a three day flight, or a two orbit flight. The three day flight would represent a complete shakedown of the orbiter's systems, but would require that most of the orbiter's systems be completed and certified for flight. The two orbit flight could be done without fuel cells, opening the payload bay doors, deploying the radiators, etc. It could be accomplished earlier and would prove the essential automated launch, orbital manoeuvre, and landing systems.


Buran in storageBuran in storage - Buran in storage at Baikonur.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 55,464 bytes. 574 x 390 pixels.


While this debate was underway a collective letter was sent to the Soviet government by workers on the project, including the cosmonauts Volk and Leonov. This letter argued that the first flight should be piloted, as was the American space shuttle. In order to resolve the issue, a special commission was appointed to study the alternatives. The commission decided in favour of the two orbit automated flight.

Buran was first moved to the launch pad on 23 October 1988. The launch commission met on 26 October 1988 and set 29 October 06:23 Moscow time for the first flight of the first Buran orbiter (Flight 1K1). 51 seconds before the launch, when control of the countdown switched to automated systems, a software problem led the computer program to abort the lift-off. The problem was found to be due to late separation of a gyro update umbilical. The software problem was rectified and the next attempt was set for 15 November at 06:00 (03:00 GMT). Came the morning, the weather was snow flurries with 20 m/s winds. Launch abort criteria were 15 m/s. The launch director decided to press ahead anyway. After 12 years of development everything went perfectly. Buran, with a mass of 79.4 tonnes, separated from the Block Ts core and entered a temporary orbit with a perigee of -11.2 km and apogee of 154.2 km. At apogee Burn executed a 66.6 m/s manoeuvre and entered a 251 km x 263 km orbit of the earth. In the payload bay was the 7150 kg module 37KB s/n 37071. 140 minutes into the flight retrofire was accomplished with a total delta-v of 175 m/s. 206 minutes after launch, accompanied by Igor Volk in a MiG-25 chase plane, Buran touched down at 260 km/hr in a 17 m/s crosswind at the Jubilee runway, with a 1620 m landing rollout. The completely automatic launch, orbital manoeuvre, deorbit, and precision landing of an airliner-sized spaceplane on its very first flight was an unprecedented accomplishment of which the Soviets were justifiably proud. It completely vindicated the years of exhaustive ground and flight test that had debugged the systems before they flew.


Buran payload carBuran payload car - Rail transport car for Buran payloads.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 31,375 bytes. 548 x 275 pixels.


But this triumph was also the last hurrah. Buran would never fly again. The Soviet Union was crumbling, and the ambitious plans to use Buran to build an orbiting defence shield, to renew the ozone layer, dispose of nuclear waste, illuminate polar cities, colonise the moon and Mars, were not to be. Although never officially cancelled, funding dried up and completely disappeared from the government's budget after 1993.

Originally three flight orbiters were to be built, but this was increased to 5 in 1983. Structurally the first three orbiters were essentially completed, while the extra two remained unbuilt except for the engine units The final Buran test flight plan at the beginning of 1989 was as follows:

Development of the launch vehicle cost 1.3 billion roubles, with an estimated total economic effect of 6 billion roubles. Total cost of the Energia-Buran project was put at 14,5 billion roubles. It involved the work of 1206 subcontractors and 100 government ministries. The cost of Buran - a significant part of the effort to maintain strategic and technical parity with the United States - contributed to the collapse of the Soviet system and its own demise. Today the flight orbiters sit in their assembly halls in Baikonur, covered in dust. The Energia core stages sit in the MIK assembly hall, immense exhibits. The booster stages are in forlorn rows, their engines stripped for more lucrative use on Zenit and Atlas boosters launched by American companies. The orbiter mock-up stands in the safing area, quietly crumbling in the desert. The apartment buildings are vacant. The rest is silence.


Buran safing areaBuran safing area - Buran safing area with LC 1 launch pad in the distance.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 23,192 bytes. 540 x 201 pixels.


Buran Technical Description

Although of the same aerodynamic shape and size as the shuttle, Buran differs in detail. The following table compares the two spaceplanes:

Shuttle - Buran Comparison
ShuttleBuran
Mass Breakdown (kg):  
Total Structure / Landing Systems46,60042,000
Functional Systems and Propulsion37,20033,000
SSME14,200
Maximum Payload25,00030,000
  
Total123,000105,000
 
Dimensions (m):  
Length37.2536.37
Wingspan23.8023.92
Height on Gear17.2516.35
Payload bay length18.2918.55
Payload bay diameter4.574.65
Wing glove sweep81 deg78 deg
Wing sweep45 deg45 deg
 
Propulsion  
Total orbital maneuvering engine thrust5,440 kgf17,600 kgf
Orbital Maneuvering Engine Specific Impuse313 sec362 sec
Total Maneuvering Impulse5 kgf-sec5 kgf-sec
Total Reaction Control System Thrust15,078 kgf14,866 kgf
Average RCS Specific Impulse289 sec275-295 sec
Normal Maximum Propellant Load14,100 kg14,500 kg
Schedule:  
Go-aheadJul 26 1972Feb 12 1976
Years after go-ahead:  
Delivery to launch complex6.69.3
Flight Readiness Firing8.510.3
First launch vehicle flight8.711.2
First orbiter flight8.712.7


Buran artilceBuran artilce - Buran handling article deteriorates in safing area.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 27,419 bytes. 458 x 369 pixels.


Overview

The Buran orbiter was designed for 100 flights. Optimum crew was four, a pilot, co-pilot, and two cosmonauts specialising in EVA and payload operation. These four crew members were on the upper deck and all were provided with ejection seats. However up to ten crew could be carried by using additional seats on the lower deck. Four to six of these would be researchers, depending on the mission. Buran could achieve a 1,700 km cross range on re-entry, protected by 39,000 tiles of two types. Synthetic quartz fibre tiles were used in low temperature areas, and black high-temperature organic fibre tiles were used on high temperature areas. Carbon-carbon material was used for the nose and wing leading edges.

Modular universal equipment was developed for Buran that would be used on other spacecraft and space stations. These included the docking module, airlock, manipulator arm, and payload cradle. These items represented 12,000 kg of Buran's lift-off mass.


Buran rollout - fwdBuran rollout - fwd - Buran rollout - forward view of launch vehicle on transporter.

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 21,973 bytes. 351 x 239 pixels.


The Buran launch sequence was as follows:

Buran's maximum payload was 30 tonnes to a 250 km 50.7 degree orbit with 8 tonnes or propellant loaded. 27 tonnes could be placed into a 450 km with the maximum 14.5 tonne propellant load. Supplementary propellant tanks, fitted in the payload bay, would allow the orbiter to achieve orbital apogees of up to 1000 km. Maximum landing mass was 87 tonnes with a 20 tonne payload; nominal landing mass was 82 tonnes with a 15 tonne payload. Normal flight duration was 10 days, which could be extended to 30 days with extra consumable tanks and supplies. G-loads on the crew were no greater than 3.0 G on ascent and 1.6 G on re-entry. The Buran had a lift-to-drag ratio of 1.5 hypersonic and 5.0 subsonic. Landing speed was 312 km/hour nominal and 360 km/hr with maximum payload. Landing run with three drag chutes was 1100 to 2000 m.


Buran rollout - aft Buran rollout - aft - Buran rollout - aft view of launch vehicle on transporter.

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 24,901 bytes. 333 x 281 pixels.


Crew Cabin - The Buran crew cabin had a total habitable volume of 73 cu. m and consisted of two sections. The upper command module had two crew positions (RM-1 and RM-2) for the pilot and co-pilot equipped with ejection seats. There was also an emergency evacuation hatch in the cabin ceiling from which exit could be made by ropes in case of a crash landing or ditching at sea. A later variant would provide two double ejection seats for four crew. Crew controls in the command module consisted of the MKP command guidance module, the GSP gyro-stabilisation platform; RVV radio-altimeter; and NIVS navigation visualisation system. The lower cabin section was the BO living cabin, with accommodations for up to 8 additional cosmonauts. The cabin crew wore Strizh space suits, which provided five minutes of independent oxygen in the case of cabin depressurisation. EVA's would be conducted using the Orlan suits developed for Salyut and Mir.

Payload Bay - The OPG payload section, 18.55 m x 4.65 m, also housed the guidance system electronics, the engine control systems, propellant piping and conduits, the electric fuel cell generators, and the fuel cell reactant tanks. According to mission, within the payload bay were also the SKPG payload cradle holding fixture and associated electrical/electronic/hydraulic/pneumatic interfaces; the SM docking module (spherical, 2.67 m diameter with a cylindrical tunnel); the APAS androgynous docking unit.


Buran erected on padBuran erected on pad - Buran rollout - erection of launch vehicle on pad

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 24,913 bytes. 349 x 231 pixels.


Base Block - The BB base block housed the modular ODU orbiter engine unit, three VSU auxiliary power units (split into left and right modules), the hydraulic system, and a hermetically sealed instrument compartment.

Wings - the wing profile was developed by TsAGI after many tests at all speed regimes. The basic double delta wing has a 45 degree sweep, with 78 degrees of sweep at the wing gloves. The wing form consists of symmetrical base file, with thickness 12% of cord, 40% of length. Fuselage is of cylindrical form, with a 14 degree transition section. The vertical stabiliser has a 60% sweep.

Structural materials - The orbiter structure was built of conventional aircraft-grade Aluminium alloy D16. Fuselage details were of aluminium 1163, and the cabin module of Aluminium 1205. Titanium VT23 was used in high strength structural members - the girdle longerons of the wings, the fuselage spanners, the barrel section of the payload bay, the wing gloves, and the fuselage spanners carrying the launch vehicle loads. Nomex blankets were used in the payload bay.


Buran on padBuran on pad - Buran on pad - 800 pixel width

Credit: Dr.Vadim P.Lukashevich. 143,437 bytes. 800 x 600 pixels.


Major systems:


Buran CRT - 100-20kmBuran CRT - 100-20km - Buran cockpit re-entry/landing display, from 100 km to 20 km altitude: 1 - Actual and commanded velocity angle; 2 - Actual and required velocity angle; 3, 10 - Angle of attack and distance-to go; maximum, actual, and nominal values; 4 - Velocity and Mach Number; 5, 13 - Nominal and maximum spacecraft position, based on temperature and structural limits; 6 - Course setting; 7 - Commanded and actual angle of attack; 8 - Altitude; 9- Fuel quantity; 11 - Bank angle; 12 - Distance to landing field; 14 - Nominal and actual position of spacecraft

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 22,275 bytes. 426 x 323 pixels.


Buran Development

Over 232 experimental test stands were built during Energia development. Development of the Buran orbiter required a further 100 test stands, 7 complex modelling stands, 5 flying laboratories, 6 full-scale mock-ups, and 2 flight mock-ups (OK-ML-1 and OK-MT).

Functional system qualification tests were conducted before first flight on 780 individual equipment items and 135 systems. Rigorous qualification tests were conducted of all structural components. Structural elements were tested individually, and then in ever larger assemblies. 1000 experiments of various types were conducted on 600 structural subassemblies. The result was that the flight data very closely followed predictions, and both the launch vehicle and orbiter flew successfully on their very first flights. This was in sharp contrast to the numerous early failures of the Soyuz and N1 programmes in the 1960's.

Six full-scale functional mock-ups of Buran were built:

In addition to the full-scale mock-ups, the following were instrumental in Buran development:

Buran Assembly / Processing / Launch / Landing Facilities

Using the N1 facilities at Baikonur as a starting point, major modifications had to be made and several new buildings erected to assemble and launch Buran at the remote Baikonur cosmodrome. The land-locked location of Baikonur meant that major assembly work on the orbiter and launch vehicle had to be conducted on site, instead of at the subcontractors factories. The liquid oxygen and liquid hydrogen tanks of the core, and the Buran orbiters, were flown to Baikonur on the back of the 3M-T transport. The booster stages and all other material and equipment were brought in by rail.

Major Buran facilities at Baikonur, in the order of their occurrence in the orbiter process flow, were:


Specification

Craft.Crew Size: 10. Design Life: 70 days. Orbital Storage: 30.00 days. Total Length: 36.4 m. Maximum Diameter: 5.5 m. Total Habitable Volume: 73.00 m3. Total Mass: 105,000 kg. Total Payload: 30,000 kg. Total Propellants: 14,600 kg. Total RCS Impulse: 5,000,000.00 kgf-sec. Primary Engine Thrust: 17,600 kgf. Main Engine Propellants: Lox/Sintin. Main Engine Isp: 362 sec. Total spacecraft delta v: 500 m/s. Electric system: 30.00 total average kW. Electrical System: Fuel Cells.


Buran Chronology


01 December 1971 Study of reusable space shuttle authorised. Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Buran EnginesBuran Engines - Buran Detail of Engines

Credit: © Mark Wade. 48,102 bytes. 671 x 513 pixels.


Military-Industrial Commission (VPK) Decree 'On Carrying out Work on Reusable Space Systems-response to NASA's Space Shuttle' was issued.
12 February 1976 Development of Energia-Buran system authorised Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The government decree 132-51 authorising development of the Energia-Buran system was titled 'On development of an MKS (reusable space system) consisting of rocket stages, orbiter aircraft, inter-orbital tug, guidance systems, launch and landing facilities, assembly and repair facilities, and other associated facilities, with the objective of placing in a 200 km Northeast orbit a payload of 30 tonnes and returning a payload of 20 tonnes'. The Ministry of Defence was named the Program Manager, with NPO Energia as the prime contractor. The official military specification (TTZ) was issued at the same time with the code name Buran.


17 February 1976 Energia, Buran, Mir, Luch, Potok approved; N1 formally cancelled. Launch Vehicle: N1, N1F, Energia.


Buran propulsionBuran propulsion - Buran propulsion system diagram

Credit: from Semenov, et. al., Buran, 1995.. 39,403 bytes. 316 x 447 pixels.


Central Committee of the Communist Party and Council of Soviet Ministers Decree 'On work on Energia-Buran, DOS-7K nos. 7 and 8, Gamma. Geyzer (Potok), and Altair (Luch) and cancellation of the N1' was issued. The design of an improved model of the Salyut DOS-17K space station was authorised as part of the third generation of Soviet space systems in a decree. At that time it was planned that the two stations (DOS-7 and DOS-8) would be equipped with two docking ports at either end of the station and an additional two ports at the sides of the forward small diameter compartment. Luch and Potok were elements of the second generation global command and control system (GKKRS) deployed in the first half of the 1980's. Luch satellites, analogous to the US TDRS, provided communications service to the Mir space station, Buran space shuttle, Soyuz-TM spacecraft, military satellites, and the TsUPK ground control center. They also served to provide mobile fleet communications for the Soviet Navy.

Buran model with MirBuran model with Mir - Buran model with Mir station core as payload

Credit: © Mark Wade. 20,703 bytes. 243 x 431 pixels.


11 June 1976 Buran design selected. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Decree 'On selection of design layout for Buran' was issued. Following exhaustive analysis and inability to improve on the design, a straight aerodynamic copy of the US space shuttle, was selected as the Buran orbiter configuration. MiG was selected as subcontractor to build the orbiter. For this purpose MiG spun off a new design bureau, Molniya, with G E Lozino-Lozinskiy as chief designer.


08 November 1976 Buran specification approved.

Decree 'On approval of a tactical-technical requirement for Buran' was issued.


12 December 1976 Buran draft project completed. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The MKS draft project was completed on 12 December 1976.The military assigned the system the index number 1K11K25 and the launch vehicle the article number 11K25.



37KB37KB - 37KB instrumentation payload carried aboard first Buran flight. This module is closely related to the Kvant module on Mir and a similar x-ray astronomy module that Buran would have flown to Mir if it had not been cancelled.

Credit: © Mark Wade. 62,683 bytes. 574 x 394 pixels.


18 December 1976 Soviet Presidium directs co-operation on Buran Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Military-Industrial Commission (VPK) Decree 'On course of work on Energia-Buran' was issued. The declaration of the Presidium directed co-operation between all concerned user, research, and factory organisations in realising the project. Chief Constructor within NPO Energia was I N Sadovskiy. Chief Designer for the launch vehicle was Y P Kolyako and for the orbiter P V Tsybin. NPO Yuzhnoye in the Ukraine would build the booster rockets.


01 July 1977 Buran draft project reviewed by expert commissin Launch Vehicle: Energia.
15 July 1977 Buran draft project reviewed by expert commission Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

A critical step in any Soviet project, this approved the design and paved the way for development to begin.



Advanced ReconnsatAdvanced Reconnsat - Advanced Buran-serviced pallet-based reconnaisance platform designed by Kozlov OKB.

18,695 bytes. 419 x 297 pixels.


21 November 1977 Buran development plan approved Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The government decree 1006-323 set out the development plan. The flight test plan was for first launch of the booster in 1983, with the payload being an unmanned OK-ML-1 mock-up of the orbiter. This would not have a heat shield and remain attached to the booster. A second mock-up, OK-ML-2, would be used on the second launch, but be separated from the vehicle after burnout. However it would also be without heat shield, and be expended. The first flight Buran was to fly unpiloted in 1984. Manned flights were to be routine by the 1987 seventieth anniversary of the Soviet Union.


01 January 1978 Work begins on conversion of 3M bomber to 3M-T Energia/Buran transport. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Buran on approachBuran on approach - Buran on landing glideslope as viewed from MiG-25

Credit: RKK Energia. 12,589 bytes. 308 x 240 pixels.


3M bomber was selected to carry piggy-back Energia core stage components and Buran orbiters.
01 May 1978 Buran technical project completed Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The technical project was completed in May 1978. The flight test plan at the beginning of the project foresaw first launch of the booster in 1983, with the payload being an unmanned OK-ML-1 mock-up of the orbiter. The first flight Buran was to fly unpiloted in 1984. Manned flights were to be routine by the 1987 seventieth anniversary of the Soviet Union.


15 May 1978 Buran technical project completed. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Buran engineering details were definitised and drawing release began to the production shops.


01 January 1979 Buran model delivered to Baikonur Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Soviet OrbitersSoviet Orbiters - Soviet Spaceplanes: from left: Spiral, Urgagan, Buran, MAKS

11,794 bytes. 350 x 163 pixels.


The EUK13 dimensional model of the launch vehicle was delivered to Baikonur for handling demonstrations and production of tooling.
31 December 1979 Energia model delivered to Baikonur Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

In 1979 the EUK13 dimensional model of the Energia launch vehicle was delivered to Baikonur for handling demonstrations and production of tooling.


01 January 1982 Problems with development of Buran booster rockets Launch Vehicle: Energia, Zenit.

Continued development problems with the booster rockets led to a management shake-up at Yuzhnoye in January 1982. By this time the project was several years behind schedule. The originally planned first flight in 1983 was obviously unattainable.


06 January 1982 First test flight of VM-T transport with Energia hydrogen tank. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Buran dragchuteBuran dragchute - Buran dragchute deployment on landing.

Credit: RKK Energia. 15,812 bytes. 310 x 238 pixels.


First test of the modified 3M bomber, converted to carry piggy-back Energia core stage components and Buran orbiters.
31 January 1982 Management shake-up at Yuzhnoye. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Continued development problems with the Energia booster rockets led to a management shake-up at the Yuzhnoye design bureau.


01 December 1982 4M Energia mock-up completed, Launch Vehicle: Energia.

During 1982 the 3M-T transport aircraft was completed and began delivery of central block propellant tanks and structural elements for construction of a realistic mock-up of the booster.


31 December 1982 Energia mock-up completed Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The 4M Energia launch vehicle high fidelity mock-up was completed at Baikonur.



Buran engineersBuran engineers - Buran engineers discuss cutaway

Credit: RKK Energia. 21,132 bytes. 308 x 239 pixels.


01 March 1983 First flight of 3M-T transport with Buran orbiter.
01 May 1983 Energia dynamic tests Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The 4M Energia mock-up was subjected to dynamic / vertical / load tests in May-October 1983. The 4M was then returned to the shop for fitting of complete functional propellant systems.


15 May 1983 Energia full-scale loads tests Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The 4M Energia mock-up was used for dynamic/vertical/load tests in May-October 1983. The 4M was then returned to the shop for fitting of complete functional propellant systems.


01 August 1983 OK-KS Buran systems test stand completed Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The OK-KS Buran systems test stand was built at NPO Energia to conduct tests not possible on other stands. These included electrical layout, pneumo-hydraulic tests in abort conditions, EMI tests, failure mode response, telemetry, interface with the launch vehicle, software systems test.



Buran at KorolevBuran at Korolev

Credit: RKK Energia. 15,058 bytes. 312 x 240 pixels.


15 August 1983 OK-KS Buran systems test stand completed Program: Buran.

The OK-KS Buran systems test stand was built at NPO Energia to conduct tests not possible on other stands. These included electrical layout, pneumo-hydraulic tests in abort conditions, EMI tests, failure mode response, telemetry, interface with the launch vehicle, software systems test. The test series was completed in March 1984. 77% of the tests of the OK were automated, compared with only 5% for the Soyuz-TM.


01 December 1983 Buran OK-ML-1 mock-up arrived at Baikonur Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The OK-ML-1 orbiter mock-up arrived atop the 3M-T at Baikonur. This action seems to have been in the fine Soviet tradition of individual enterprises proving they have met the plan, even if the method of doing it is useless. OK-ML-1 was to have been used in the first launch of the Energia, by the end of 1983. By delivering it to Baikonur by December 31, the spacecraft builders could claim, 'well, we met OUR part of the plan...'). OK-ML-1 was used for handling and pad compatibility tests.



Buran model testBuran model test - Test of Buran-Energia subscale model

Credit: RKK Energia. 12,544 bytes. 310 x 240 pixels.


13 December 1983 Flight trials of Buran auto-land system aboard Tu-154 test-bed. Program: Buran.

Flight trials of the Buran automatic landing system are begun on a modified Tu-154 transport.


31 December 1983 OK-ML-1 orbiter mock-up arrives at Baikonur Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The OK-ML-1 mock-up arrived atop the 3M-T transport aircraft. OK-ML-1 was originally to have been used in the first launch of the Energia, by the end of 1983. But the program was years behind schedule, and in the end the OK-ML-1 was used for handling and pad compatibility tests.


01 March 1984 OK-KS Buran systems test series completed

77% of the tests of the OK were automated, compared with only 5% for the Soyuz-TM.


01 August 1984 Buran OK-MT mock-up arrived at Baikonur

This functional mock-up was used for systems integration tests, and was to be expended on the second test flight.



Buran touchdownBuran touchdown

Credit: RKK Energia. 20,614 bytes. 341 x 240 pixels.


31 August 1984 OK-ML-2 orbiter mock-up arrives at Baikonur Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The OK-ML-2 (former OK-MT) functional mock-up was used for systems integration tests, and was to have been expended on the second test flight.


01 January 1985 An-225 project started. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: MAKS.

System specification issued for An-225 heavy transport, which will replace 3M-T for transport of Energia core stage components and the Buran spaceplane. The aircraft will also be the launcher for the MAKS spaceplane.


01 March 1985 Energia cold flow tests begun Launch Vehicle: Energia.

From March-October 1985 the Ts core stage was back on the UKSS for cold flow tests. A total of nine cryogenic fuelling cycle were completed with the 4M Energia mock-up, representing the first operational use in the world of super-chilled hydrogen.



Buran LVBuran LV - Buran-Energia launch vehicle 3 view

16,208 bytes. 295 x 400 pixels.


15 March 1985 Energia cold flow tests. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

From March-October 1985 the Ts core stage was back on the UKSS test/launch stand for cold flow tests. A total of nine cryogenic fuelling cycle were completed with the 4M Energia mock-up, representing the first operational use in the world of super-chilled hydrogen.


10 November 1985 First OK-GLI Buran analogue flight

Cosmonaut Igor Volk was at the controls; takeoff was from the Zhukovskiy test flight centre near Moscow. Two flying labs, based on Tu-154 transports, were used to prior to this to duplicate anticipated Buran handling and test systems software. They conducted 140 flights before Buran's first flight, including 69 automatic landings at Zhukovskiy and at the Jubilee airfield at Baikonur.


01 December 1985 Buran wings delivered to Baikonur Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Buran landingBuran landing

Credit: RKK Energia. 9,811 bytes. 250 x 209 pixels.


In December 1985 the wings of the first flight OK arrived at Baikonur. This was followed by what was to be the first 20 second Energia main engine firing test. This was terminated at 2.58 seconds when the automatic control system detected a slow spool up of an engine turbine. In a the first attempt at a full-duration test helium leaks contaminated electro-hydraulic systems, leading to a situation where the tanks could not be drained. An engineering brigade had to work on the fuelled booster for 55 minutes, attach another helium tank, which led to successful de-fuelling of the vehicle. The second engine test was a complete success, the engine running for 390 seconds. This test required the entire city of Leninsk to be without water for ten days in order to accumulate enough water for the UKSS cooling system.
15 December 1985 Wings for first flight Buran arrive at Baikonur Program: Buran.
01 January 1986 Buran program shakeup Launch Vehicle: Energia.


Buran LiftoffBuran Liftoff - Liftoff of Buran

24,717 bytes. 456 x 378 pixels.


By January 1986 it was clear that the project, now three years behind schedule, had no prospect of completion due to problems in obtaining deliveries of equipment for Buran, numerous problems in assembling the orbiters and lack of manpower at Baikonur, and a general loss of management focus. Minister O D Bakhnov called large group of industry leaders to the cosmodrome to review measures to concentrate and accelerate the remaining work. Three 'Tiger Teams' were set up. The first, led by Semenov, was to finish the flight Buran orbiter and associated facilities in time for a third quarter 1987 launch. The second, led by B I Gubanov, was to finish the Energia launch vehicle and fly it, without the Buran mock-ups if necessary, at the earliest possible date. The third group, led by S S Banin, was to complete the assembly and launch facilities.
31 January 1986 Buran project in crisis Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

By January 1986 it was clear that the project, now three years behind schedule, had no prospect of completion due to problems in obtaining deliveries of equipment for Buran, numerous problems in assembling the orbiters and lack of manpower at Baikonur, and a general loss of management focus. Minister O D Bakhnov called a large group of industry leaders to the cosmodrome to review measures to concentrate and accelerate the remaining work. Three 'Tiger Teams' were set up. The first, led by Semenov, was to finish the flight Buran orbiter and associated facilities in time for a third quarter 1987 launch. The second, led by B I Gubanov, was to finish the Energia launch vehicle and fly it, without the Buran mock-ups if necessary, at the earliest possible date. The third group, led by S S Banin, was to complete the assembly and launch facilities.


15 February 1986 First Buran payload arrives at Baikonur Program: Buran.

The first Buran payload, 37KB module s/n 37070, is delivered by freight car. The 37KB modules, similar to the Kvant module of the Mir space station, were to be standard on the early Buran flights. 37KB-37070 itself primarily contained instrumentation to measure the performance of the orbiter and its structure on its first flight.


21 March 1986 First Energia full thrust test Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

This was to be the first 20 second Energia main engine firing test. It was terminated at 2.58 seconds when the automatic control system detected a slow spool up of an engine turbine. In a the first attempt at a full-duration test helium leaks contaminated electro-hydraulic systems, leading to a situation where the tanks could not be drained. An engineering brigade had to work on the fuelled booster for 55 minutes, attach another helium tank, which led to successful de-fuelling of the vehicle.


01 May 1986 Electrical tests of the Buran flight vehicle began Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Tests of the orbiter's ODU engine unit uncovered an apparent defect in gaseous oxygen valves of the reaction control system. Although it threatened to delay flight of the Buran, it was eventually discovered to be a software problem and remedied within days.


15 May 1986 Electrical tests of the Buran flight vehicle begin Program: Buran.
01 August 1986 UKSS static tests of Energia Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Further UKSS tests of Energia were conducted in preparation of a test launch without Buran. These were conducted using a dummy payload and solid rocket motors to simulate loads from the booster rockets. Following this vehicle 6SL was selected for the first actual launch. The launch vehicle used by itself without Buran was named Energia by Glushko only just before the launch.


15 August 1986 Tests of Energia with payload cannister Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Following the decision to make the first flight of Energia without a Buran orbiter, in August-September 1986 further UKSS tests of Energia were conducted. These used a dummy payload and solid rocket motors to simulate loads from the booster rockets.


01 September 1986 Second Energia full thrust test Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The second engine test was a complete success, the engine running for 390 seconds. This test required the entire city of Leninsk to be without water for ten days in order to accumulate enough water for the UKSS cooling system.


11 May 1987 Energia-Polyus Launch Vehicle: Energia.

Energia was to deliver the military Skif-DM Polyus battle station into orbit. Due to delays in completion of the enormous static test facility at Baikonur, which could test the entire Energia vehicle stack, it was decided to launch the vehicle without the verification the tests would provide. The launch of 6SL was planned for 21:30 Moscow time. It was delayed five hours when a leak was detected in the Block 3A electrical distribution section, then by another hour due to a fault LH2 thermostat. The launch vehicle performed successfully, but the payload failed to inject itself into orbit due to a guidance system failure.


31 May 1988 Buran certified ready for flight. Program: Buran.

All flight and development tests having been completed, Buran is certified as ready for spaceflight.


23 October 1988 Buran moved to the launch pad Launch Vehicle: Energia.
26 October 1988 Buran launch commission meets Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The launch commission met on 26 October 1988 and set 29 October 06:23 Moscow time for the first flight of the first Buran orbiter (Flight 1K1).


29 October 1988 Buran first launch attempt Launch Vehicle: Energia.

51 seconds before the launch, when control of the countdown switched to automated systems, a software problem led the computer program to abort the lift-off. The problem was found to be due to late separation of a gyro update umbilical. The software problem was rectified and the next attempt was set for 15 November at 06:00 (03:00 GMT).


15 November 1988 Buran Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The weather was snow flurries with 20 m/s winds. Launch abort criteria were 15 m/s. The launch director decided to press ahead anyway. After 12 years of development everything went perfectly. Buran, with a mass of 79.4 tonnes, separated from the Block Ts core and entered a temporary orbit with a perigee of -11.2 km and apogee of 154.2 km. At apogee Burn executed a 66.6 m/s manoeuvre and entered a 251 km x 263 km orbit of the earth. In the payload bay was the 7150 kg module 37KB s/n 37071. 140 minutes into the flight retrofire was accomplished with a total delta-v of 175 m/s. 206 minutes after launch, accompanied by Igor Volk in a MiG-25 chase plane, Buran touched down at 260 km/hr in a 17 m/s crosswind at the Jubilee runway, with a 1620 m landing rollout. The completely automatic launch, orbital manoeuvre, deorbit, and precision landing of an airliner-sized spaceplane on its very first flight was an unprecedented accomplishment of which the Soviets were justifiably proud. It completely vindicated the years of exhaustive ground and flight test that had debugged the systems before they flew.


13 May 1989 First flight An-225 / Buran. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: MAKS.

First flight of the An-225 super-heavy transport with the Buran spaceplane mounted atop it.


04 June 1989 An-225 / Buran displayed at Paris Air Show. Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: MAKS.
30 June 1993 Yeltsin cancels Buran project Program: Buran. Launch Vehicle: Energia.

No known mission (with the end of SDI and the cold war) - plus the project manager was one of the 1991 coup plotters. Total cost 20 billion rubles at time of cancellation.


01 December 1994 Buran 5 Program: Mir. Flight Crew: Volk, Tolboyev.

Buran Flight 5 (3K1) would have been the first flight of the third orbiter. It would be the first manned Buran flight; the third orbiter was the first outfitted with life support systems and ejection seats. Two cosmonauts would deliver the 37KBI module to Mir, using the Buran manipulator arm to dock it to the station's Kristall module. Final crew selection had still not been made at the time the program was cancelled. The original crew was Volk and Stankiavicius, with Levchenko and Shchukin as back-ups. Both Levchenko and Shchukin died in 1988; Bachurin and Borodai were selected as the new back-up crew. By July 1992 the Soviet Air Force and NPO Energia were still arguing about the final crew composition. The Air Force wanted all test pilot crews (those indicated) while Energia wanted to include a flight engineer in each crew. The Buran project was finally cancelled in June 1993 when further funding was deleted from the Russian space budget.


01 February 1996 Frst Buran payload arrived in Baikonur Launch Vehicle: Energia.

The first Buran payload, 37KB module s/n 37070, arrived in Baikonur. The 37KB modules, similar to the Kvant module of the Mir space station, were to be standard on the early Buran flights. 37KB-37070 itself primarily contained instrumentation to measure the performance of the orbiter and its structure on its first flight.



Bibliography:



Back to Index
Last update 12 March 2001.
Contact Mark Wade with any corrections or comments.
Conditions for use of drawings, pictures, or other materials from this site..
© Mark Wade, 2001 .